Rules.NO PERSONAL ATTACKS Please keep comments constructive! Personal attacks, insults, and bad faith criticism of other posters' equipment or music will not be tolerated. Also, fair warning to all- racism, sexism, hate speech, or harassment of any sort will result in an instant and permanent ban. We have a zero tolerance policy for that sort of thing and it is strictly enforced.NO SALES POSTS Sale/trade/buy posts are not allowed.

1. Roger Troutman Patch Microkorg Cookbook 2017
2. Roger Troutman Patch Micro Korg Cookbooks
3. Microkorg Patch List

KORG・microKORGと、YAMAHA・DX100の、自分の設定しているトークボックスの音色を比較してみました。 曲目は「風の谷のナウシカ」 個人的な感想だと. Jul 11, 2016  i re created roger troutman's mini moog sound patch on my Microkorg.this sound patch sounds exactly the same.

Roger Troutman Patch Microkorg Cookbook 2017

THE MICROKORG COOKBOOK Custom patches, tutorial videos and more. Share your tips and tricks for microKorg and microKorg XL. Patch settings can be whatever you.

Please go to instead. Links to uncommonly great specials/deals are allowed. If you are the manufacturer or developer of a commercial product, please message the mods before posting, but we will usually allow new product promotion as long as you stay to answer questions.ANSWER QUESTIONS ABOUT YOUR OWN CONTENT Links to streams of your music are allowed only if you intend on fielding questions about your production and your use of synthesizers in your music. If you are not willing to field questions then your post will be removed.NO LOW EFFORT MEMES Please refrain from basic meme type posts (macro texts, advice animals, etc). Go to or one of the Facebook Synth Memes groups instead.LEAVE A COMMENT ON LINK/PHOTO/VIDEO POSTS Link, photo, and video posts must include a meaningful comment by the OP. “Here is a track I made” or 'look at my new synth' is not sufficient since the point is to encourage discussion.

Roger Troutman Patch Micro Korg Cookbooks

Posts lacking a comment will be removed at the moderators discretion.NO PRICE SHAMING Some equipment doesn’t cost much, some costs a lot. There is room for everything from Volcas to CS80s in this sub. Criticism of gear based on its sound, features, etc is ok. Criticism of gear or the people that buy it based on your opinion of its cost is not.NO PIRACY This is an instaban. If you use our community to encourage any sort of IP theft you will be banned, no questions asked. Support the people that make all of this possible.Meta.Weekly Discussions.

Mondays: What Should I Buy?. Wednesdays: No Stupid Questions. Fridays: Friday HangoutLet's Talk.Browser Based Synths. play with real hardware synthesizers through your web browserRadio.

listen to an automatically generated playlist of videos from this communities submitted postsRelated SubredditsGear and Software.Music and Synthesis. Last year I picked up a banshee rocktron 2 talkbox and have mostly just been using my guitar, the sawtooth preset on my casio privia px-310, and NI Massive and FM8.

However, I'd rather have a REAL hardware instrument, and the casio REALLY doesn't cut it. I'm also in the market for a decent synth.

I know everyone jumps to say 'Yamaha Dx100' for talkboxing, but those aren't too easy to come. My question is, would it really matter?

Will FM give me a better sound to work with on the talkbox than an analog synth? If so would any FM like the Dx7 or the rack modules cut it? I'd also prefer having something that I can enjoy using beyond talkboxes (Currently I'm strongly leaning towards the MS-20 mini).I've tried looking at youtube videos for comparison, but honestly I can't get a good comparison since the skill level of the talkboxer varies so much. I'm not too concerned with price as long as it doesn't really break the bank.Tl;Dr What are the pros/cons of using one or the other, FM synthesis or subtractive synthesis in the context of talkboxing?.

Everyone is going to say Yamaha DX100, but every single other Yamaha DX can do the job just fine. The DX100 is the least feature rich DX in the entire line, and you can load the good talkbox patches on any DX, and it will be the same.6-operator DXs cannot load the famous talkbox patches, but they can be converted for use on a 6-operator synth easily with DXconvert. Every 4-operator DX (except the DX9) can load the talkbox patches from a DX100, and every other 4-operator DX is cheaper than a DX100.For example, a DX27 is the full size version of the DX100. It can be found for between $100 and $150 even in perfect condition. The DX21 is like the DX27 and the DX100, but it has more features like chorus, and a pitch LFO, and more patch space. It also can be had for between $100 and $150 in perfect condition.

You can buy a DX11, a V50, or a TX81Z for between $100 and $200, and they can all load the DX100 talkbox patches. Even a real DX7 is only $200-$300, and it can make the same sounds as well (and so much more).People use FM because that's what they could get. It makes good talkbox sounds, but before there was FM, people used analog synths for their talkbox sounds. Roger Troutman allegedly used a Moog for a while before he started using the DX100. I think it's just preference.

You can use anything, but the FM synths were preferred for that sound. The sawtooth sounds were not as harmonically rich, but they still sounded like sawtooths. It makes it a little easier to understand.By the way,. Since a talkbox basically turns your mouth into a low-pass filter, any synth capable of outputting a tone with a nice range of harmonics should work fine.FM synthesis is capable of creating a wider range of harmonically-rich timbres than a typical subtractive synth, so you might want to get a 4-op or 6-op FM synth.The Yamaha FB-01 is a 4-operator FM synth much like the DX100, but it can be found much easier and usually for far less money as well; the only downside is you need a software editor to create patches on it.

Microkorg Patch List

You could just download some talkbox presets for the DX100 and use TXconvert to convert it to FB-01 sysex format, though.You also might want to look into the TX81Z, which is a 4-op FM synth as well, but it can be edited without any software and also has extra waveforms which can be used for modulation instead of just sine waves like on the FB-01 or DX100. But the way the filtering works out is it creates super resonant peaks in the spectrum (the formants) and reduces the areas in between those peaks. If you stick with harmonic signals like simple waveforms, it's harder to discern the nature of those peaks because they can be pretty wide. Adding a bit of wideband noise to fill in the gaps between the harmonics of a simple waveform brings out the nature of the filtering. Kind of like playing noise through a lowpass filter that's near self oscillation.If you play with vocoders you'll see most of them have noise generators just for this purpose.

In fact, it's really hard to get the classic vocode sound where you can actually understand what's being said without any noise at all. But at extreme levels you get not so much raspyness as alien and brutal sounding, which is also cool. Shit, I would never suggest anyone edit their TX81Z manually. Get the software and you will have a great time making any sounds, it's a beautiful editor granted it's not a VST so you won't be doing much live editing short of a lot of equipment.If you can't find a DX100 or DX7 for cheap, you usually can grab a TX81Z fairly easily for under $100. It's a great piece of gear and can be set up to work well with any other hardware.Alternatively, the Dexed VST is practically the same thing as a DX7, if you want to use something that's entirely free to test out the talk box with.